<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-Virus software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://milostopic.com/2009/11/03/anti-virus-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://milostopic.com/2009/11/03/anti-virus-software/</link>
	<description>[...my thoughts, observations, comments and questions...mainly about technology]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milos</title>
		<link>http://milostopic.com/2009/11/03/anti-virus-software/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Milos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milostopic.com/?p=2232#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Gentlemen, thank you for sharing your experiences and confirming that these tools are indeed still ahead of their competitors. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only other product I would add is Kaspersky (Luke mentioned it as well). Thus far it&#039;s been the most complete solution I came across.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gentlemen, thank you for sharing your experiences and confirming that these tools are indeed still ahead of their competitors. </p>
<p>The only other product I would add is Kaspersky (Luke mentioned it as well). Thus far it&#39;s been the most complete solution I came across.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milos</title>
		<link>http://milostopic.com/2009/11/03/anti-virus-software/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Milos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milostopic.com/?p=2232#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Gentlemen, thank you for sharing your experiences and confirming that these tools are indeed still ahead of their competitors. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only other product I would add is Kaspersky (Luke mentioned it as well). Thus far it&#039;s been the most complete solution I came across.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gentlemen, thank you for sharing your experiences and confirming that these tools are indeed still ahead of their competitors. </p>
<p>The only other product I would add is Kaspersky (Luke mentioned it as well). Thus far it&#39;s been the most complete solution I came across.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maciakl</title>
		<link>http://milostopic.com/2009/11/03/anti-virus-software/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>maciakl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milostopic.com/?p=2232#comment-258</guid>
		<description>This is a difficult question because most A/V software makers focus mainly on Windows (for obvious reasons) and few of them offer clients for other OS&#039;s. So you either go with the best Windows product you can find, or the one that&#039;s multi-platform. The two are rarely the same. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;d second recommendation for Malwarebytes here. It is currently one of the best tools for malware removal out there. I have only seen few cases in which it failed - and those were on systems that were so badly compromised that they were beyond saving.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Spybot used to be great, but nowadays it sort of faded into obscurity. It&#039;s detection rate is far below that of Malwarebytes. I&#039;d use &lt;a href=&quot;http://superantispyware.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;superantispyware.com&lt;/a&gt; instead. Great detection rate, and excellent removal record. I usually use it to complement Malware bytes. Stuff that one of them misses is usually picked up by the other and vice versa.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally, ESET NOD 32 is indeed quite impressive. I decided to try it on a lark one day and I liked very much for one important reason: footrpint. It&#039;s very small, consumes very little resources compared to McAfee and Symantec  while offering comparable features. That or Kaspersky - similar feature set and low footprint.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for A/V suites that work on Linux? I only know two: ClamAV and BitDefender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a difficult question because most A/V software makers focus mainly on Windows (for obvious reasons) and few of them offer clients for other OS&#39;s. So you either go with the best Windows product you can find, or the one that&#39;s multi-platform. The two are rarely the same. </p>
<p>I&#39;d second recommendation for Malwarebytes here. It is currently one of the best tools for malware removal out there. I have only seen few cases in which it failed &#8211; and those were on systems that were so badly compromised that they were beyond saving.</p>
<p>Spybot used to be great, but nowadays it sort of faded into obscurity. It&#39;s detection rate is far below that of Malwarebytes. I&#39;d use <a href="http://superantispyware.com" rel="nofollow">superantispyware.com</a> instead. Great detection rate, and excellent removal record. I usually use it to complement Malware bytes. Stuff that one of them misses is usually picked up by the other and vice versa.</p>
<p>Finally, ESET NOD 32 is indeed quite impressive. I decided to try it on a lark one day and I liked very much for one important reason: footrpint. It&#39;s very small, consumes very little resources compared to McAfee and Symantec  while offering comparable features. That or Kaspersky &#8211; similar feature set and low footprint.</p>
<p>As for A/V suites that work on Linux? I only know two: ClamAV and BitDefender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viktor Turchyn</title>
		<link>http://milostopic.com/2009/11/03/anti-virus-software/comment-page-1/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Viktor Turchyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://milostopic.com/?p=2232#comment-255</guid>
		<description>I am not sure what would be the best solution for you to use on OS X and Linux distributions, but on Windows platform I would recommend to use a set of AV, anti-malware and anti-spyware solutions.   ESET NOD 32, Malwarebytes, and Spybot work well for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure what would be the best solution for you to use on OS X and Linux distributions, but on Windows platform I would recommend to use a set of AV, anti-malware and anti-spyware solutions.   ESET NOD 32, Malwarebytes, and Spybot work well for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

